30 mag 2009

Polìcia Assassina

Caro leitor, bela leitora, 

Nesta manhà a Paris, quando abro o site do G1 para ler as notìcias do meu Brasil Brasile amado, encontro esta matéria: Imagens mostram presos sendo torturados em MG (link aqui). O que pensar, quem criticar, o que dizer?Tanto, nada!

A instituiçào POLìCIA é falida em todo o mundo. Aqui na Europa os policiais abusam do poder, mas nada comparado às tais cenas mostradas no vìdeo relacionado. E aqueles animais fardados que procuravam celulares através de tortura foram somente afastados do posto de trabalho, junto com o diretor da prisào, que passivamente, e por isso cumplice (e talvez o mandante), assistia a violència.

Por que pessoas como aquelas nào podem ser julgadas por um tribunal civil, popular, com a acusaçào de tortura, ato violento, abuso de poder e autoridade, e outras coisas que qualquer promotor pùblico poderia levantar? Por que o nome daqueles indivìduos nocivos à sociedade nào sào divulgados, como adoram fazer os jornais em caso de crime cometido por moradores de uma favela, por exemplo?
Por que?

Termino com duas frases gritadas continuamente contra a Polìcia em Paris, que também é violenta, mas incomparàvel com a brasileira, a tropa de elite!



"police partoutjustice nulle part"

"FlicsPorcsAssassins"

27 mag 2009

BERLUSCONI pior que o fascismo

Baleful influence of Burlesque cronies

Published: May 26 2009 20:12 | BY FINANCIAL TIMES

Fascism is not a likely future for Italy. That is worth saying, because it is being forecast. Many assume that the financial crisis plus Silvio Berlusconi equals a return to fascism. It did, after all, start there.

But that is an unlikely outcome now. Italy in the early 1920s, when Benito Mussolini rose to power, was reeling from a brutally Pyrrhic victory over the Austrians in 1918, the degradation of the political class and a rising threat from leftwing totalitarianism. Mr Berlusconi is clearly no Mussolini: he has squads of starlets, not of Blackshirts.

The real dangers lie elsewhere. Over the 15 years of his political career – always as prime minister, or as leader of the opposition – he has had a largely untrammelled opportunity to shift the national mood rightwards. This he has done not by crude propaganda but by a steady concentration on glitz, glitter and girls and a hyperbolic style of media-geared rhetoric that sees all opposition as communist and himself as a victim.

Now, as hard questions are posed on his relationship with a teenage would-be starlet – first raised by his wife – he has turned on the most obstinate questioner, the left-of-centre daily La Repubblica, issued a veiled threat through an associate and sought to render the questions invalid because politically tainted.

He has shown equal belligerence towards magistrates who judged he had bribed the British lawyer David Mills (to avoid corruption charges) – calling them “leftwing activists” – even though parliament has made him immune from prosecution.

Still dissatisfied even with such a useful parliament, he has called it “useless” and said it should be drastically reduced to 100 members, while his powers increase. He has sought to rouse the masses in his favour, by encouraging a “popular initiative” to collect the required 500,000 signatures for the measure.

But the danger of Berlusconi is of a different order to that of Mussolini. It is that of media sapping the serious content of politics, and replacing it with entertainment. It is of a ruthless demonisation of enemies and refusal to grant an independent basis to competing powers. It is to place a fortune at the service of the creation of a massive image, composed of assertions of endless success and popular support.

That he is so dominant is partly the fault of a faltering left; of weak and sometimes politicised institutions; of journalism which has too often accepted a subaltern status. Most of all it is the fault of a very wealthy, very powerful and increasingly ruthless man. No fascist, but a danger, in the first place to Italy, and a malign example to all.

13 mag 2009

Anticonstitucional e ineficaz



Leia o artigo sobre a proibiçào arbitrària e cruel de livre circulaçào publicada pelo site G1. Clique aqui

Fernandòpolis, Ilha Solteira e Itapura, todas no interior do Estado de SP (Governo PSDB/DEM) sancionaram uma lei municipal que proìbe a presença de adolescentes nas ruas depois das 23 horas, justificando que o ìndice de crimes praticados por jovens dessa classe é alto.

O direito constitucional e humano de "ir e vir", isto é de liberdade, foi roubado desses garotos. Um absurdo. Querem diminuir a violència? Trabalhem com a educaçào, coisa que o governo PSDB ignora ao longo da història,.

O Brasil continua a tratar a ferida com curativo. Nào adianta. Muitas vezes é melhor deixar o machucado aberto para cicatrizar e ao mesmo tempo investir tempo, capital na cura do problema.